PDF XChange Forum

Hello, Mirabella

Thank you for the suggestion, I cannot make any promises, but I will bring this suggestion up to the Dev team for consideration.

Kind regards,

Hello, Nimrod_189

Glad to hear you have found a solution. I wish I could say we plan to offer the same, but at this time it does not seem likely.

Kind regards,

Hello, Nimrod_189 While it would be possible to create a custom tool via PDF-Tools and call it, most settings, including the page numbers to be used for Insert/extract pages cannot be modified directly via CMD. You can find a complete list of available PDF-tools CMD actions here: https://help.pdf-xc...

Hello,

As Rakunavi says, the above use of the explorer.exe application would be the only way to achieve this at the moment, and it would come with all the relevant limitations.

Kind regards,

Hello, MedBooster In all "tabs" it should already be working that way. I presume you mean in all "windows" in which case, I am afraid not yet. As for the latter items, those would be part of the request above, if we see more support I can nudge the team for a priority increase, b...

Hello, McWeb This is not an error in our software, but in the document itself, as the error message itself indicates. Unlike our competitors, who choose to silently address issues like this, we elect to inform you when such problems arise, so that you can identify the cause, and action it, instead o...

Hello, Davide78 When printing, no, because Outlook does not provide the attachment data in a print operation, we have no way to know it is present in the first place. However, if you have a license for our Standard printer (Part of the PDF-XChange PRO bundle) and are using a locally installed versio...

Hello, Stormo If changes are not being saved, there is an error occuring during the closing process preventing us from writing, or some third party application is reverting those changes after they are made. We store your settings in the windows "current user" registry, so if you have any ...

Hello, MedBooster I think you initial post is repeating what Stefan just confirmed, but I am glad to hear that works for you. As for paste at mouse of base content, this works as long as you have a base content editing tool selected before pasting: PDFXEdit_xsaiV0Tt77.gif Simply Right click > paste,...

Hello, josch80 Thank you for the interest, I have put in another request to raise the priority of this feature, as well as poked the Dev team directly by asking if the suggested handling for the merge pages tool should be a new ticket or part of the same. Hopefully this brings more attention to the ...

Hello, MedBooster Retaining the size from the previous collection when moving the content into the new collection? No, this is not possible at all. Retaining the size of the original stamp that was present on a page being replaced with new content, possibly... It would be a process of deleting the o...

Hello, rakunavi From a technical perspective, any line in this editing mode is a "path", while a "line" is not accurate to the function, as it actually adds dozens of "line/path" objects in succession. Meanwhile, Drawing is in many cases too similar to "pencil"...

Hello, Jensen Head Thank you for the report, The current nightly once again seems to have less of an issue but it does appear to be slightly "overskewing" the image still. Unfortunately in this documents case, the main item we use to determine skew (lines of text) are curved due to a poor ...

Hello, A slightly faster method might be to open the Content panel, and select the images present there for deletion, but depending on the structure of each document, as Willy warned, it is possible that some of those images do contain visible "text" even if it is not real text content. As...

Hello, It does seems that Willy's solution here will be the only one to take in this case. The watermark/background removal tools rely on the content items being specifically flagged as such, and cannot remove items which are not defined as one of those content types. His method should work, but it ...

Hello, taosecurity That is expected if your document has any background at all, redaction is designed to completely remove all content (background colors are included as "content"). The "none" setting means that instead of placing a rectangle of color in that location, it will le...

Hello, MedBooster First, your mention of "nonsensical" characters, could I ask for a copy of the original PDF, and your export with these settings? (Also, just to be sure I am testing the same function, can you show me how exactly you have selected "export selection to word"? 1) ...

Hello, MedBooster Regarding the first post, the most likely issue is that a hard return character is present there. alignment does not change reflow positions, you would need to manually remove the return character so that the justification can have a tangible effect. Otherwise, creating new items a...

Hello, MedBooster

I have reproduced this issue. Thank you for the report. The dev's will be informed and hopefully we can see a resolution in the next release.

Kind regards,

Hello, Davide78 The comments panel offers many grouping options, and yes, you can group them by author: image.png I should note that any of the items which are not comments (mostly, those items you mentioned which are "printed" from another app, like AutoCAD) will not be present in this li...

Hello, Wassim Shawaf Undo is only possible before you have saved a file. Once the change has been finalized with a save action, memory of that action is lost, and it is no longer possible to "undo" anything, without manually removing the added items. This is a simply facet of how PDF in ge...

Hello, JeffAllen I dont believe that I saw any similar reports myself of such an issue existing back in that build, but we have released quite a few new versions since. If there is any chance it is a bug in the older version, I would recommend that you update to build 392, and see if that resolves t...

Hello, rakunavi The wording change does seem to indicate that it may have been intentional, but I will withhold judgement until Ive spoken to the Dev team. This "new handling" certainly feels a little bit off if it is intended. I have just written to our UI lead to ask if it was a planned ...

Hello, rakunavi

Thank you for the detailed breakdown, I do hope this is similar to what was being reported here, but nonetheless it does appear to be an issue which needs some fixing!
I have sent it to our Dev team for review, and hope we can see some improvements in time.

Kind regards,

Hello, taosecurity You you have a few options here. When using the "redact" tool, it is intended that the text is not repositioned, and a "block" is left in that location. What you can do to keep the old background color, is change the block color to "none" here: image....

Hello, Willy Van Nuffel

Thank you very much, I do hope that this solution works in various other versions of word, and is not limited to 2016 or earlier versions...

Kind regards,

Hello, MedBooster That looks like a screenshot from inside of the Editor. Changing this setting will not affect the appearance of anything inside the Editor, it only prevents us from adding any additional linebreak characters to the content that is put into the clipboard. If you are looking to "...

Hello, MedBooster

There is no setting to do so actively for already opened documents, the active tool can only be inherited by newly opened documents during the open process. This is intentional and will not be changing at this time.

Kind regards,

Hello, MedBooster I am afraid that any subdivision/segregation of this option is not possible without reworking how we split our windows. Currently everything is one "frame" in a single "instance" of the software. To offer what you are looking for, would require that we split the...

Hello, MedBooster

I am glad to hear you have found a viable solution to this.

Kind regards,

Hello, MedBooster I am afraid that would not be possible. All content in a stamp is locked to its original appearance prior to selection for placement, except dynamic form field items, which need to be finalized and flattened immediately prior to placement. To my knowledge, not even this form data i...

Hello, nickelelr I cannot make any promises, such extended search actions would be quite a few steps of configuration, and may end up more cumbersome than manual selection anyway, but I will pass the idea along for consideration. If I hear good news, I will come back with a ticket number for this it...

Hello, Nimrod_189

I am glad to hear you have found a solution! Did you have any other item you are still looking for a solution on?

Kind regards,

Hello, Willy Van Nuffel Thank you very much for digging into this and getting an answer out willy, Its been a busy day and I missed finalizing my reply on this topic earlier in the day. Yours was much more digestible than my reply so I scrapped it in favor of a thank you. As for the items which Loki...

Hello, MedBooster I appreciate the positive outlook, at this time, duplication of the UI "tabs" is still not possible, but i will check and see if it is something we might offer in the future. As for the other two, they have been passed along to the team for another review. If we hear good...

Hello, MedBooster

Could I ask you to export and send us a copy of these settings? I am using an internal nightly build, and either I am missing a step to reproduce, or this has already been fixed for the next build. With your settings I can confirm if things are back to normal.

Kind regards,

Hello, Chiron If updates are still happening automatically despite our updater being disabled/not running/otherwise configured correctly Than I am afraid the issue lies elsewhere - Most likely your security software. For clarity, our default settings in the updater will never offer an update which w...

Hello, PHK I am glad to see you have a working process and am sorry to say that I am not well versed enough in JS to offer such a solution myself. By extension, this is a bit too niche to see a new feature made explicitly for it, unless we see a large volume of users confirming that they need to do ...

Hello,

Thank you Rakunavi for the assist and the shoutout to that feature request. Hopefully this answer and the upcoming changes help!

Kind regards,

Hello, mCHSNUg5Pz8cPap

Well, we will have to wait and see what comes, but I am in agreement about normalizing the position of the "which pages to affect" section of the dialogue.

Kind regards,

Hello, rakunavi

Just a quick followup, we do now have a bug ticket for this issue:

RT#7229: Bug: Resize - Scale/Growth dont allow "no-change-offset"

Kind regards,

Hello, again A quick review on our discussions so far (note this is not a confirmation, this is still very much just a concept discussion). I still cannot make any promises, but a possible change we could make to clarify what is happening is re-ordering the modals in this dlg, along with a slight de...

Hello, David.P Perhaps it would help if the "headers" of each category were labeled as: "Desired sheet size" and "Apply to page/range(s)" As for the other suggested text changes, I cannot promise anything, but I can at least forward them to the team. as for this specifi...

Search found 9953 matches